<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for nescivi.nl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nescivi.nl/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nescivi.nl</link>
	<description>Marije Baalman's personal website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:52:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Downloads by Live Coding &#171; Notes for my Classes</title>
		<link>http://www.nescivi.nl/?page_id=87&#038;cpage=1#comment-2163</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Coding &#171; Notes for my Classes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nescivi.nl/?page_id=87#comment-2163</guid>
		<description>[...] redFrick uses SuperCollider, which is a language that&#8217;s fairly popular with live coders. Another SuperCollider live coder is Marije Baalman. She&#8217;s one of the core developers of SuperCollider. We watched a video of her live coding on a Greyhound bus, which you can download from here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] redFrick uses SuperCollider, which is a language that&#8217;s fairly popular with live coders. Another SuperCollider live coder is Marije Baalman. She&#8217;s one of the core developers of SuperCollider. We watched a video of her live coding on a Greyhound bus, which you can download from here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.6.29 realtime kernel for Debian by Bas</title>
		<link>http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=111&#038;cpage=1#comment-1983</link>
		<dc:creator>Bas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=111#comment-1983</guid>
		<description>Erm, that should be revision with two dashes in front of it.

Somehow all my double dashes have turned into single dashes, sorry for the confusion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, that should be revision with two dashes in front of it.</p>
<p>Somehow all my double dashes have turned into single dashes, sorry for the confusion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.6.29 realtime kernel for Debian by Bas</title>
		<link>http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=111&#038;cpage=1#comment-1982</link>
		<dc:creator>Bas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=111#comment-1982</guid>
		<description>Just to let you know: if you&#039;re using Debian&#039;s unstable or testing branch, one of the commands used in this page has changed :

time fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd -rev mz1 kernel_image kernel_headers

has become:
time fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --revision mz1 kernel_image kernel_headers

i.e. make-kpkg&#039;s -rev option is now --revision

So if you get an error message like:
Unknown option: r
Unknown option: e
Unknown option: v
then use the --revision instead of -rev</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to let you know: if you&#8217;re using Debian&#8217;s unstable or testing branch, one of the commands used in this page has changed :</p>
<p>time fakeroot make-kpkg &#8211;initrd -rev mz1 kernel_image kernel_headers</p>
<p>has become:<br />
time fakeroot make-kpkg &#8211;initrd &#8211;revision mz1 kernel_image kernel_headers</p>
<p>i.e. make-kpkg&#8217;s -rev option is now &#8211;revision</p>
<p>So if you get an error message like:<br />
Unknown option: r<br />
Unknown option: e<br />
Unknown option: v<br />
then use the &#8211;revision instead of -rev</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chronotopia in Germany and Sweden in March by Philippus Baalman</title>
		<link>http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=122&#038;cpage=1#comment-1879</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippus Baalman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=122#comment-1879</guid>
		<description>Great ! We will be there in Frankfurt !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great ! We will be there in Frankfurt !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.6.29 realtime kernel for Debian by Brian Findlay</title>
		<link>http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=111&#038;cpage=1#comment-1380</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Findlay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=111#comment-1380</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this.. I just got the RT patch running on my x86_64 Intel Atom 330 board with 2.6.31.4 release.  I did a few things differently..

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Your new kernel &amp; headers now live in ../kernel Use dpkg -i to install (as root).
dpkg -i ../linux-headers-*.deb ../linux-image-*.deb

ME&gt;  I executed this from /usr/src rather than /usr/src/linux-2.6.31.4  which 
ME&gt; may or may not explain below..

So good so far… but the kernel didn’t boot yet…
and the initrd file was missing

ME&gt; Mine did.. initrd file was created and installed.

So with the initramfs-tools from the debian repository,
I did (as root)
mkinitramfs -o /boot/initrd.img-2.6.29-rt16 2.6.29-rt16
which created the initrd image.

ME&gt;  I didn&#039;t have to do this step

Thanks!!

Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this.. I just got the RT patch running on my x86_64 Intel Atom 330 board with 2.6.31.4 release.  I did a few things differently..</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Your new kernel &amp; headers now live in ../kernel Use dpkg -i to install (as root).<br />
dpkg -i ../linux-headers-*.deb ../linux-image-*.deb</p>
<p>ME&gt;  I executed this from /usr/src rather than /usr/src/linux-2.6.31.4  which<br />
ME&gt; may or may not explain below..</p>
<p>So good so far… but the kernel didn’t boot yet…<br />
and the initrd file was missing</p>
<p>ME&gt; Mine did.. initrd file was created and installed.</p>
<p>So with the initramfs-tools from the debian repository,<br />
I did (as root)<br />
mkinitramfs -o /boot/initrd.img-2.6.29-rt16 2.6.29-rt16<br />
which created the initrd image.</p>
<p>ME&gt;  I didn&#8217;t have to do this step</p>
<p>Thanks!!</p>
<p>Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 32bit sclang on 64bit linux by Marije Baalman</title>
		<link>http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=118&#038;cpage=1#comment-1272</link>
		<dc:creator>Marije Baalman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=118#comment-1272</guid>
		<description>http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/libs/libsndfile/libsndfile1_1.0.17-4ubuntu0.8.10.1_i386.deb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/libs/libsndfile/libsndfile1_1.0.17-4ubuntu0.8.10.1_i386.deb" rel="nofollow">http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/libs/libsndfile/libsndfile1_1.0.17-4ubuntu0.8.10.1_i386.deb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 32bit sclang on 64bit linux by Marije Baalman</title>
		<link>http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=118&#038;cpage=1#comment-1271</link>
		<dc:creator>Marije Baalman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=118#comment-1271</guid>
		<description>Location of libsndfile for Ubuntu intrepid:

http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/libs/libsndfile/libsndfile1-dev_1.0.17-4ubuntu0.8.10.1_i386.deb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Location of libsndfile for Ubuntu intrepid:</p>
<p><a href="http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/libs/libsndfile/libsndfile1-dev_1.0.17-4ubuntu0.8.10.1_i386.deb" rel="nofollow">http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/libs/libsndfile/libsndfile1-dev_1.0.17-4ubuntu0.8.10.1_i386.deb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.6.29 realtime kernel for Debian by yeeking</title>
		<link>http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=111&#038;cpage=1#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>yeeking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=111#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>Hello thought I&#039;d drop in here since I&#039;ve just spent  a few days trying to get the &#039;ultimate&#039; stable audio system going on a Thinkpad T400/ RME multiface expresscard combination... in conclusion, I&#039;ve ended up running a stock, non-realtime kernel in stock Ubuntu 8.10 with no frill whatsoever. I tried all sorts - ubuntustudio 8.04.1, debian lenny + self built 2.6.29 rt kernel, 64stiudio, ubu 9.04. I have found that this is the most stable option for me. The problem was that I wanted to have the ATI card running quietly, which it did not do with the open source drivers ait/ radeonhd (fan on all the time), i wanted no xruns and I wanted the wifi to work. suspend to RAM was a bonus. Apart from the mystical 2.6.24-rt kernel in Ubu 8.04, no realtime kernel that I tried would work with the ATI proprietary drivers. I didn&#039;t use 8.04 since the wifi did not work and it ended up being really unstable with the RME. 

With the stock 8.10 system, jockey-installed ati drivers I just run jack as root - sudo jackd -R -d alsa -d hw:1 and I can happily run my RME multiface at ~21ms latency with no xruns with supercollider and a heavy CPU load, which is find for me. I know that&#039;s not 2ms... but at least it works, Don&#039;t know why, but those realtime kernels make me feel like I&#039;m somehow vilolating my system... 

- matthew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello thought I&#8217;d drop in here since I&#8217;ve just spent  a few days trying to get the &#8216;ultimate&#8217; stable audio system going on a Thinkpad T400/ RME multiface expresscard combination&#8230; in conclusion, I&#8217;ve ended up running a stock, non-realtime kernel in stock Ubuntu 8.10 with no frill whatsoever. I tried all sorts &#8211; ubuntustudio 8.04.1, debian lenny + self built 2.6.29 rt kernel, 64stiudio, ubu 9.04. I have found that this is the most stable option for me. The problem was that I wanted to have the ATI card running quietly, which it did not do with the open source drivers ait/ radeonhd (fan on all the time), i wanted no xruns and I wanted the wifi to work. suspend to RAM was a bonus. Apart from the mystical 2.6.24-rt kernel in Ubu 8.04, no realtime kernel that I tried would work with the ATI proprietary drivers. I didn&#8217;t use 8.04 since the wifi did not work and it ended up being really unstable with the RME. </p>
<p>With the stock 8.10 system, jockey-installed ati drivers I just run jack as root &#8211; sudo jackd -R -d alsa -d hw:1 and I can happily run my RME multiface at ~21ms latency with no xruns with supercollider and a heavy CPU load, which is find for me. I know that&#8217;s not 2ms&#8230; but at least it works, Don&#8217;t know why, but those realtime kernels make me feel like I&#8217;m somehow vilolating my system&#8230; </p>
<p>- matthew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.6.29 realtime kernel for Debian by The Great Sudoku</title>
		<link>http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=111&#038;cpage=1#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>The Great Sudoku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=111#comment-987</guid>
		<description>another EPIC fail of Debian&#039;s was the tinkering with &quot;kernel-package&quot; as to NOT include an initrd image even when *I SPECIFY* in make-kpkg that I want one!  How counter-intuitive can you get?  At least Ubuntu hasn&#039;t gone this route yet and still uses a SANE kernel-package that actually *GASP* creates and installs an init image when I tell it to.  I love Debian to death, but come on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another EPIC fail of Debian&#8217;s was the tinkering with &#8220;kernel-package&#8221; as to NOT include an initrd image even when *I SPECIFY* in make-kpkg that I want one!  How counter-intuitive can you get?  At least Ubuntu hasn&#8217;t gone this route yet and still uses a SANE kernel-package that actually *GASP* creates and installs an init image when I tell it to.  I love Debian to death, but come on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.6.29 realtime kernel for Debian by nescivi</title>
		<link>http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=111&#038;cpage=1#comment-983</link>
		<dc:creator>nescivi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nescivi.nl/?p=111#comment-983</guid>
		<description>I really just posted this, so I am still testing things out, as it is not yet performing as well as I want.
I started an email thread on the Linux-Audio-Users list on this too.

The audio apps I am using are mainly jack and SuperCollider, with the occasional wave editor at times (mhwaveedit currently).

My main purpose to build a realtime kernel is to get rid of xruns I am getting with the stock kernels, which are quite annoying during performances with about 500 or more people hearing them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really just posted this, so I am still testing things out, as it is not yet performing as well as I want.<br />
I started an email thread on the Linux-Audio-Users list on this too.</p>
<p>The audio apps I am using are mainly jack and SuperCollider, with the occasional wave editor at times (mhwaveedit currently).</p>
<p>My main purpose to build a realtime kernel is to get rid of xruns I am getting with the stock kernels, which are quite annoying during performances with about 500 or more people hearing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
